Comparing outcomes of adjustable spectacles and conventional refraction methods among mongolian children in a service-delivery program

2nd International Conference on Ophthalmology & Vision Science

August 04, 2025 | Virtual Event

Laura Haller

Touro University,, USA

Abstract :

Objective: To compare the vision and refractive power outcomes of self-refraction with ad- justable spectacles vs non-cycloplegic refraction by an ophthalmologist among Mongolian school-aged children in a large service-delivery program.
Design: Cross-sectional study
Setting: One urban and three rural schools in Mongolia.
Participants: A total of 4,144 children aged 8-17 years old, with presenting visual acuity ≤6/12 in either eye due to uncorrected or under-corrected refractive error.
Interventions: All participants underwent at least one of three refractive modalities without cycloplegia: self-refraction supervised by a trained school physician, self-refraction super- vised by an ophthalmologist, or subjective refraction by an ophthalmologist. The main anal- yses focus on children undergoing all three modalities.Main Outcome Measures: Proportions achieving target visual acuity (VA, defined as 6/9 or better in the better-seeing eye).
Results: Among 4,144 school-aged children (mean age: 12.6 ± 2.63 years), 65.3% were girls and 34.7% were boys. The mean spherical equivalent refractive power in the better-seeing eye was -1.25 D (SD: 1.25 D). A total of 1,074 children (25.9%) underwent all three refraction modalities. The proportion of participants achieving a VA of 6/9 or better in the better-see- ing was significantly higher for subjective refraction by an ophthalmologist (93.6%,P<0.001) compared to ophthalmologist-supervised self-refraction (80.8%, P<0.001), and school physi- cian-supervised self-refraction (77.6%, P<0.001). In multivariable logistic regression models, older age (OR 0.87, 95% CI - 0.13, p < 0.001), female sex (OR 0.75, 95% CI -0.29, p = 0.004),
lower cylindrical refractive power (OR 0.75, 95%, CI -0.29, p < 0.001) and self-refraction su- pervised by an ophthalmologist were independently associated with lower risk of failing to achieve target VA.
Conclusions: Among a large cohort of children in this low-resource setting, results with self-re- fraction were worse than with traditional refraction by an ophthalmologist, but some 80% of children could still achieve good results

Biography :

Laura Haller, ranked 1st in her class with a 4.0 GPA, is a dedicated and compassionate medical student with a strong commitment to serving others. Before medical school, she worked as the lead ophthalmic technician in ocular oncology at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, gaining extensive experience in complex eye disease management. She has served thousands in Harlem, New York through vision screenings and glasses delivery programs and has participated in medical missions to Nicaragua which reinforced her commitment to global healthcare. Outside of medicine, she has a background as an international professional dancer and is an accomplished marathon runner.